Org-Babel and Erlang Escripts

James Aimonetti — Thu, 06 Oct 2016 03:25:41 GMT

I recently wrote an escript for work that used the wonderful getopt application for processing command-line arguments. Part of that script includes printing the script usage if passed the `-h` or `–help` flag.

As part of my initiative to use orgmode's literate programming capabilities, I wrote a `README.org` for the script that described how to install pre-requisites, what the script does, etc. I also wanted to include the usage text as part of the doc, since part of what I've been doing was adding more flags to tune the operations of the script.

The tricky thing is that the real usage text and what was in the doc frequently grows apart as development occurs. Wouldn't it be great to have the README.org stay in sync with what the current usage flags are?

Org-babel SRC blocks to the rescue!

With the appropriate SRC block, you can capture the results as part of the doc when exporting (or just capture the results in place) to a new format.

For my use case, I used a simple shell SRC block (with appropriate headers) to run the script with the appropriate flag:

./my_escript -h

Evaluating the SRC block with `C-cC-c` creates the attending `#+RESULTS:` section below. Except…it was empty. I couldn't figure out why the script's output wasn't showing up. Simple shell commands like `pwd` showed up just fine. What do?

STDERR vs STDOUT

Ah yes; it turns out that, by default, getopt prints usage to stderr instead of stdout. A quick fix to call getopt:usage/3 with `standard_in` as the third argument and the results showed up as expected.

I'm sure there are some other tricks to getting org-babel to get stderr output into the results but from my cursory searching it looked a bit more convoluted and not worth the time when I could fix it with such a small change.

Chewing the Cud (Posts about emacs erlang escript org-mode orgmode org-babel)

Org-Babel and Erlang Escripts

Org-babel SRC blocks to the rescue!

STDERR vs STDOUT